 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sains Malaysiana 54(8)(2025): 2075-2086
http://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2025-5408-16
Radiation Dose Study of LINAC Source
around Healthy Organs in Cancer Examination using Farmer Chamber Ionization
Detector
(Kajian Dos Sinaran Sumber
LINAC di Sekitar Organ Sihat dalam Pemeriksaan Kanser menggunakan Pengesan Kebuk
Pengionan Petani)
1Department
of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Andalas,
Sumatera Barat, 25163, Indonesia
2Healthineers
Company, Forchheim-91301, Germany
3Medical Physics,
Radiotherapy Installation, Unand Hospital, Padang, 25176, Indonesia
Diserahkan: 26 Disember 2024/Diterima:
23 Jun 2025
Abstract
Cancer
treatment using ionizing radiation is known to cause damage to healthy tissue
around the target. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the dose in the area
around the cancer target to ensure the amount received by the patient does not
exceed the specified tolerance limit. Measurements
were performed using a Farmer-type ionization chamber detector on a phantom
slab. The variations in the field area used were 5 × 5 cm2 and 10 ×
10 cm2 at depths of 1.5 cm, 4 cm, 6 cm, 8 cm, and 10 cm, as well as
a distance of 3 cm, 5 cm, 7 cm, 10 cm, and 15 cm outside the radiation field.
The dose value was measured based on the IAEA TRS No.398 protocol. The results showed that the
percentage of the dose decreased below 10% at a distance of 5 cm for a field
area of 5 × 5 cm2. Meanwhile, for a field area of 10 × 10 cm2,
the percentage of the dose decreased below 10% after passing a distance of 7 cm
from the edge of the radiation field. Based on the results, the percentage of
the measured dose was greater for the enlarged depth. Areas outside the cancer target still
receive unneeded radiation doses. The value of the dose received depends on the
energy used, the size of the field, and the distance from the edge of the field.
Keywords: Cancer;
depth; dose; edge distance; LINAC
Abstrak
Rawatan kanser menggunakan sinaran pengionan
diketahui boleh menyebabkan kerosakan pada tisu sihat di sekeliling sasaran.
Justeru, penyelidikan ini bertujuan untuk mengukur dos di kawasan sekitar
sasaran kanser bagi memastikan jumlah yang diterima pesakit tidak melebihi had
toleransi yang ditetapkan. Pengukuran dilakukan menggunakan pengesan kebuk
pengionan jenis Petani pada papak fantom. Variasi luas lapangan yang digunakan
ialah 5 × 5 cm2 dan 10 × 10 cm2 pada kedalaman 1.5 cm, 4
cm, 6 cm, 8 cm dan 10 cm serta jarak 3 cm, 5 cm, 7 cm, 10 cm dan 15 cm di luar
medan sinaran. Nilai dos diukur berdasarkan protokol IAEA TRS No. 398.
Keputusan menunjukkan bahawa peratusan dos menurun di bawah 10% pada jarak 5 cm
untuk kawasan medan seluas 5 × 5 cm2. Manakala, bagi kawasan medan
seluas 10 × 10 cm2, peratusan dos menurun di bawah 10% selepas
melepasi jarak 7 cm dari tepi medan sinaran. Berdasarkan keputusan, peratusan
dos yang diukur adalah lebih besar untuk kedalaman yang diperbesarkan. Kawasan
di luar sasaran kanser masih menerima dos sinaran yang tidak diperlukan. Nilai
dos yang diterima bergantung pada tenaga yang digunakan, saiz medan dan jarak
dari tepi medan.
Kata kunci: Dos; jarak tepi; kanser;
kedalaman; LINAC
RUJUKAN
Abdelaal,
A.M., Attalla, E.M. & Elshemey, W.M. 2020. Estimation of out-of-field dose
variation using Markus ionization chamber detector. SciMedicine Journal 2(1): 8-15. https://doi.org/10.28991/scimedj-2020-0201-2
Abdelaal,
A.M., Attalla, E.M. & Elshemey, W.M. 2017. Dose estimation outside
radiation field using Pinpoint and Semiflex ionization chamber detectors. Radiation
Physics and Chemistry 139: 120-125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.04.006
Antolak,
J.A. & Rosen, I.I. 1999. Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: How much
margin is needed? International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology
Physics 44(5): 1165-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00117-0
Balasubramanian,
R., Sellakumar, P., Bilimagga, R.S., Supe, S.S. & Sankar, B.N. 2006.
Measurements of peripheral dose for multileaf collimator based linear
accelerator. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy 11(6): 281-285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1507-1367(06)71073-2
Bosse,
C., Narayanasamy, G., Saenz, D., Myers, P., Kirby, N., Rasmussen, K.,
Mavroidis, P., Papanikolaou, N. & Stathakis, S. 2020. Dose calculation
comparisons between three modern treatment planning systems. Journal of
Medical Physics 45(3): 143-147. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_111_19
Bresolin,
A., Bonfantini, F., Stucchi, C.G., Mongioj, V., Carrara, M. & Pignoli, E.
2017. Study of the ionization chamber response to flattening-filter-free photon
beams. Radiation Measurements 97: 47-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.12.011
Burnet,
N.G., Thomas, S.J., Burton, K.E. & Jefferies, S.J. 2004. Defining the
tumour and target volumes for radiotherapy. Cancer Imaging 4(2): 153-161.
https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2004.0054
Connell,
P.P. & Hellman, S. 2009. Advances in radiotherapy and implications for the
next century: A historical perspective. Cancer Research 69(2): 383-392.
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6871
De Saint-Hubert, M.,
Suesselbeck, F., Vasi, F., Stuckmann, F., Rodriguez, M., Dabin, J., Timmermann,
B., Thierry-Chef, I., Schneider, U. & Brualla, L. 2022. Experimental validation of an analytical program and a Monte Carlo
simulation for the computation of the far out-of-field dose in external beam
photon therapy applied to pediatric patients. Frontiers in Oncology 12:
882506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.882506
DeWerd,
L.A. & Kissick, M. 2013. The Phantoms of Medical and Health Physics:
Devices for Research and Development. New York: Springer.
Dinh,
C.N. & Nowak, J. 2021. Natural radioactivity in thermal waters: A case
study from poland. Energies 14(3): 541.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030541
Gargett,
M.A., Briggs, A.R. & Booth, J.T. 2020. Water equivalence of a solid phantom
material for radiation dosimetry applications. Physics and Imaging in
Radiation Oncology 14: 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.05.003
Garrett,
L., Hardcastle, N., Yeo, A., Lonski, P., Franich, R. & Kron, T. 2021.
Out-of-field dose in stereotactic radiotherapy for paediatric patients. Physics
and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 19: 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.05.006
Hong,
J.W., Lee, H.K. & Cho, J.H. 2015. Comparison of the photon charge between
water and solid phantom depending on depth. International Journal of
Radiation Research 13(3): 229-234.
Howell,
R.M., Scarboro, S.B., Kry, S.F. & Yaldo, D.Z. 2010. Accuracy of
out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system. Physics
in Medicine and Biology 55(23): 6999-7008.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/23/S03
Huang,
Y.J., Kuo, T.C., Chen, C.Y., Chang, C.H., Wu, P.C. & Wu, T.H. 2009. The
design and implementation of a solar tracking generating power system. Engineering
Letters 17: 4.
Inayat,
A., Nassef, A.M., Rezk, H., Sayed, E.T., Abdelkareem, M.A. & Olabi, A.G.
2019. Fuzzy modeling and parameters optimization for the enhancement of
biodiesel production from waste frying oil over montmorillonite clay K-30. Science
of the Total Environment 666: 821-827.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.321
International
Atomic Energy Agency. 2008. IAEA Technical Report Series. European Journal
of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 35(5): 1030-1031.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0767-4
Khan,
F.M. 2014. The Physics of Radiation Therapy (5 ed.). Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins.
Kry, S.F., Titt, U.,
Pönisch, F., Followill, D., Vassiliev, O.N., White, R.A., Mohan, R. &
Salehpour, M. 2006. A Monte Carlo model for
calculating out-of-field dose from a varian 6 MV beam. Medical Physics 33(11): 4405-4413. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2360013
Lam,
K.L., Muthuswamy, M.S. & Ten Haken, R.K. 1996. Flattening-filter-based
empirical methods to parametrize the head scatter factor. Medical Physics 23(3): 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597798
Li,
X.A., Ma, C.M. & Salhani, D. 1997. Measurement of percentage depth dose and
lateral beam profile for kilovoltage x-ray therapy beams. Physics in
Medicine and Biology 42(12): 2561-2568.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/42/12/019
Licona,
I., Figueroa-Medina, E. & Gamboa-deBuen, I. 2017. Dose distributions and
percentage depth dose measurements for a total skin electron therapy. Radiation
Measurements 106: 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.12.002
Liu,
Q., Liang, J., Zhou, D., Krauss, D.J., Chen, P.Y. & Yan, D. 2018.
Dosimetric evaluation of incorporating patient geometric variations into
adaptive plan optimization through probabilistic treatment planning in head and
neck cancers. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 101(4): 985-997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.03.062
Marín, A., Martín, M., Liñán, O., Alvarenga, F., López, M.,
Fernández, L., Büchser, D. & Cerezo, L. 2015. Bystander effects
and radiotherapy. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy 20(1):
12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2014.08.004
Matuszak,
N., Kruszyna-Mochalska, M., Skrobala, A., Ryczkowski, A., Romanski, P.,
Piotrowski, I., Kulcenty, K., Suchorska, W.M. & Malicki, J. 2022. Nontarget
and out-of-field doses from electron beam radiotherapy. Life 12(6): 858.
https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060858
Mazonakis,
M. & Damilakis, J. 2021. Out-of-field organ doses and associated risk of
cancer development following radiation therapy with photons. Physica Medica 90: 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.09.005
Mohan,
R. 2022. A review of proton therapy - Current status and future directions. Precision
Radiation Oncology 6(2): 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1149
Mohsin,
N.I., Zakaria, A., Abdullah, R. & Wong, M.F. 2014. Peripheral dose measurement
for 6 MV photon beam. Journal of Medical Physics and Biophysics 1(1): 7-9.
Momeni,
N.S., Afraydoon, S., Hamzian, N., Nikfarjam, A., Ghasemabad, M.V., Dehkordi,
S.A., Shabani, M., Dehastani, M. & Heldari, A. 2023. The estimation of
radiation dose to out-of-field points of organs at risk in block and MLC shielded
fields in lung cancer radiation therapy. Frontiers in Biomedical
Technologies 10(2): 188-194. https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v10i2.12223
Naji,
N.A.R., Alrubai, T.A., Ridha, A.A., Nori, W. & Najma, M.A.A. 2022. Effect
of the Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT) peripheral dose on the
nipple region of the opposite breast of the obese cancer patients. ISMSIT
2022 - 6th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative
Technologies. pp. 194-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMSIT56059.2022.9932866
Oancea,
C., Granja, C., Marek, L., Jakubek, J., Šolc, J., Bodenstein, E., Gantz, S.,
Pawelke, J. & Pivec, J. 2023. Out-of-field measurements and simulations of
a proton pencil beam in a wide range of dose rates using a Timepix3 detector:
Dose rate, flux and LET. Physica Medica 106: 102529.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102529
Park,
P.C., Zhu, X.R., Lee, A.K., Sahoo, N., Melancon, A.D., Zhang, L. & Dong, L.
2012. A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to
account for setup and range uncertainties. International Journal of
Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 82(2): 329-336.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.011
Pazzaglia,
S., Eidemüller, M., Lumniczky, K., Mancuso, M., Ramadan, R., Stolarczyk, L.
& Moertl, S. 2022. Out-of-field effects: Lessons learned from partial body
exposure. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 61(4): 485-504.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-00988-0
Podgorsak,
E. 2005. Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students.
International Atomic Energy Agency.
Raj,
A., Khanna, D., Hridya, V.T., Padmanabhan, S. & Mohandass, P. 2022. A
comparison study of out-of-field photon dosimetry between two varian linear
accelerators. Onkologia i Radioterapia 16(9): 16-20.
Saminathan, S., Godson, H.F., Ponmalar, R., Manickam, R.,
Mazarello, J. & Fernandes, R. 2016. Dosimetric performance
of newly developed farmer-Type ionization chamber in radiotherapy practice. Technology
in Cancer Research and Treatment 15(6): NP113-NP120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1533034615621635
Sánchez-Nieto,
B., Medina-Ascanio, K.N., Rodríguez-Mongua, J.L., Doerner, E. & Espinoza,
I. 2020. Study of out-of-field dose in photon radiotherapy: A commercial
treatment planning system versus measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Medical Physics 47(9): 4616-4625.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14356
Sung, S-Y., Lee, H-Y., Tu, P-C., Lin, C-H., Yu, P-C., Lui,
L.T., Shaw, S., Wu, C-J. & Nien, H-H. 2017. In vivo dosimetry of skin surface for breast cancer radiotherapy using
intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique and helical tomotherapy. Therapeutic
Radiology and Oncology 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.21037/tro.2017.11.01
Swanpalmer,
J. 2024. Investigation of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction
factor (kQ,Q0) used for absorbed dose determination in megavoltage photon
beams. Radiation Measurements 176: 107208.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107208
Taylor,
M. & Kron, T. 2011. Consideration of the radiation dose delivered away from
the treatment field to patients in radiotherapy. Journal of Medical Physics 36(2): 59-71. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.79686
Technical
Report Series (TRS) No. 398. 2000. Absorbed Dose Determination in External
Beam Radiotherapy. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Wang,
K. & Tepper, J.E. 2021. Radiation therapy‐associated toxicity:
Etiology, management, and prevention. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 71(5): 437-454. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21689
Wiezorek,
T., Georg, D., Schwedas, M., Salz, H. & Wendt, T.G. 2009. Experimental
determination of peripheral photon dose components for different IMRT
techniques and linear accelerators. Zeitschrift Fur
Medizinische Physik 19(2): 120-128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2009.01.008
Zhu, T.C. & Biarngard, B.E. 1994. The
head-scatter factor for small field sizes. Medical Physics 21(1): 65-68.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597256
*Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email: ramacosfardela@sci.unand.ac.id
|
|||
|
